{"id":5135,"date":"2016-07-15T04:44:49","date_gmt":"2016-07-15T08:44:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/?p=5135"},"modified":"2022-10-17T18:42:13","modified_gmt":"2022-10-17T22:42:13","slug":"cops-drones-the-fundamentally-inhuman-status-of-minority","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/?p=5135","title":{"rendered":"Cops, Drones, and The Fundamentally Inhuman Status of Minority"},"content":{"rendered":"

[Originally Published at Eris Magazine]<\/em><\/p>\n

So Gabriel Roberts<\/a> asked me to write something about police brutality, and I told him I needed a few days to get my head in order. The problem being that, with this particular topic, the longer I wait on this, the longer I want to wait on this, until, eventually, the avoidance becomes easier than the approach by several orders of magnitude.<\/p>\n

Part of this is that I’m trying to think of something new worth saying, because I’ve already talked about these conditions, over at A Future Worth Thinking About. We talked about this in “On The Invisible Architecture of Bias<\/a>,” “Any Sufficiently Advanced Police State\u2026<\/a>,” “On the Moral, Legal, and Social Implications of the Rearing and Development of Nascent Machine Intelligences<\/a>,” and most recently in “On the European Union’s “Electronic Personhood” Proposal<\/a>.” In these articles, I briefly outlined the history of systemic bias within many human social structures, and the possibility and likelihood of that bias translating into our technological advancements, such as algorithmic learning systems, use of and even access to police body camera footage, and the development of so-called artificial intelligence.<\/p>\n

Long story short, the endemic nature of implicit bias in society as a whole plus the even more insular Us-Vs-Them mentality within the American prosecutorial legal system plus the fact that American policing was literally borne out of slavery on the work of groups like the KKK, equals a series of interlocking systems in which people who are not whitepassing, not male-perceived, not straight-coded, not “able-bodied” (what we can call white supremacist, ableist, heteronormative, patriarchal hegemony, but we’ll just use the acronym WSAHPH, because it satisfyingly recalls that bro-ish beer advertising campaign from the late 90’s and early 2000’s) stand a far higher likelihood of dying at the hands of agents of that system<\/em><\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Here’s a quote from Sara Ahmed in her book The Cultural Politics of Emotion<\/a><\/em>, which neatly sums this up:<\/p>\n

“[S]ome bodies are ‘in an instant’ judged as suspicious, or as dangerous, as objects to be feared, a judgment that can have lethal consequences. There can be nothing more dangerous to a body than the social agreement that that body is dangerous.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

At the end of this piece, I’ve provided some of the same list of links that sits at the end of “On The Invisible Architecture of Bias,” just to make it that little bit easier for us to find actual evidence of what we’re talking about, here, but, for now, let’s focus on these:<\/p>\n

A Brief History of Slavery and the Origins of American Policing<\/a>
\n2006 FBI Report on the infiltration of Law Enforcement Agencies by White Supremacist Groups<\/a>
\nJune 20, 2016 “Texas Officers Fired for Membership in KKK”<\/a><\/p>\n

And then we’ll segue to the fact that we are, right now, living through the exemplary problem of the surveillance state. We’ve always been told that cameras everywhere will make us all safer, that they’ll let people know what’s going on and that they’ll help us all. People doubted this, even in Orwell’s day, noting that the more surveilled we are, the less freedom we have, but more recently people have started to hail this from the other side: Maybe videographic oversight won’t help the police help us, but maybe it will help keep us safe from the police.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

But the sad fact of the matter is that there’s video of Alton Sterling<\/a> being shot to death while restrained, and video of John Crawford III being shot to death by a police officer while holding a toy gun down at his side in a big box store where it was sold, and there’s video of Alva Braziel<\/a> being shot to death while turning around with his hands up as he was commanded to do by officers, of Eric Garner being choked to death, of Delrawn Small<\/a> being shot to death by an off-duty cop who cut him off in traffic. There’s video of so damn many deaths, and nothing has come of most of them. There is video evidence showing that these people were well within their rights, and in lawful compliance with officers’ wishes, and they were all shot to death anyway, in some cases by people who hadn’t even announced themselves as cops, let alone ones under some kind of perceived threat.<\/p>\n

The surveillance state has not made us any safer, it’s simply caused us to be confronted with the horror of our brutality. And I’d say it’s no more than we deserve, except that even with protests and retaliatory actions, and escalations to civilian drone strikes, and even Newt fucking Gingrich being able to articulate the horrors of police brutality, most of those officers are still on the force. Many unconnected persons have been fired, for indelicate pronouncements and even white supremacist ties, but how many more are still on the force? How many racist, hateful, ignorant people are literally waiting <\/em><\/strong>for their chance to shoot a black person because he “resisted” or “threatened?” Or just plain disrespected. And all of that is just what happened to those people. What’s distressing is that those much more likely to receive punishment, however unofficial, are the ones who filmed these interactions and provided us records of these horrors, to begin with. Here, from Ben Norton at Salon.com<\/a>, is a list of what happened to some of the people who have filmed police killings of non-police:<\/p>\n

Police have been accused of cracking down on civilians who film these shootings.<\/p>\n

Ramsey Orta, who filmed an NYPD cop putting unarmed black father Eric Garner in a chokehold and killing him, says he has been constantly harassed by police, and now faces<\/a> four years in prison on drugs and weapons charges. Orta is the only one connected to the Garner killing who has gone to jail.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Chris LeDay, the Georgia man who first posted a video of the police shooting of Alton Sterling, also says<\/a> he was detained by police the next day on false charges that he believes were a form of retaliation.<\/p>\n

Early media reports<\/a> on the shooting of Small uncritically repeated the police\u2019s version of the incident, before video exposed it to be false.<\/p>\n

Wareham noted that the surveillance footage shows “the cold-blooded nature of what happened, and that the cop’s attitude was, ‘This was nothing more than if I had stepped on an ant.'”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

As we said, above, black bodies are seen as inherently dangerous and inhuman. This perception is trained into officers at an unconscious level, and is continually reinforced throughout our culture. Studies like the Implicit Association Test<\/a>, this survey of U.Va. medical students<\/a>, and this one of shooter bias<\/a>\u00a0all clearly show that people are more likely to a) associate words relating to evil and inhumanity to; b) think pain receptors working in a fundamentally different fashion within; and c) shoot more readily at<\/em><\/strong> bodies that do not fit within WSAHPH. To put that a little more plainly, people have a higher tendency to think of non-WSAHPH bodies as fundamentally inhuman<\/em><\/strong>.<\/p>\n

And yes, as we discussed, in the plurality of those AFWTA links, above, there absolutely is a danger of our passing these biases along not just to our younger human selves, but to our technology. In fact, as I’ve been saying often, now, the danger is higher, there, because we still somehow have a tendency to think of our technology as value-neutral. We think of our code and (less these days) our design as some kind of fundamentally objective process, whereby the world is reduced to lines of logic and math, and that simply is not the case. Codes are languages, and languages describe the world as the speaker experiences it. When we code, we are translating our human experience, with all of its flaws, biases, perceptual glitches, errors, and embellishments, into a technological setting<\/a>. It is no wonder then that the algorithmic systems we use to determine the likelihood of convict recidivism and thus their bail and sentencing recommendations are seen to exhibit the same kind of racially-biased decision-making as the humans it learned from<\/a>. How could this possibly be a surprise? We built these systems, and we trained them. They will, in some fundamental way, reflect us. And, at the moment, not much terrifies me more than that.<\/p>\n

Last week saw the use of a police bomb squad robot to kill an active shooter. Put another way, we carried out a drone strike on a civilian in Dallas<\/a>, because we “saw no other option.” So that’s in the Overton Window, now. And the fact that it was in response to a shooter who was targeting any and all cops as a mechanism of retribution against police brutality and violence against non-WSAHPH bodies means that we have thus increased the divisions between those of us who would say that anti-police-overreach stances can be held without hating the police themselves and those of us who think that any perceived attack on authorities is a real, existential threat, and thus deserving of immediate<\/em><\/strong> destruction. How long do we really think it’s going to be until someone with hate in their heart says to themselves, “Well if drones are on the table\u2026” and straps a pipebomb to a quadcopter? I’m frankly shocked it hasn’t happened yet<\/em><\/strong>, and this line from the Atlantic article<\/a> about the incident tells me that we need to have another conversation about normalization<\/a> and depersonalization, right now<\/em><\/strong>, before it does:<\/p>\n

“Because there was an imminent threat to officers, the decision to use lethal force was likely reasonable, while the weapon used was immaterial.”<\/p>\n

Because if we keep this arms race up among civilian populations\u2014and the police are still civilians<\/em><\/strong> which literally means that they are not military<\/em><\/strong>, regardless of how good we all are at forgetting that\u2014then it’s only a matter of time before the overlap between weapons systems and autonomous systems comes home<\/a>.<\/p>\n

And as always\u2014but most especially in the wake of this week and the still-unclear events of today<\/a>\u2014if we can’t sustain a nuanced investigation of the actual meaning of nonviolence in the Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King, Jr.’s philosophy, then now is a good time to keep his name and words out our mouths<\/p>\n

Violence isn’t only dynamic physical harm. Hunger is violence. Poverty is violence. Systemic oppression is violence. All of the invisible, interlocking structures that sustain disproportionate Power-Over at the cost of some person or persons’ dignity are violence.<\/p>\n

Nonviolence means a recognition of these things and our places within them.<\/p>\n

Nonviolence means using all of our resources in sustained battle against these systems of<\/em><\/strong> violence.<\/p>\n

Nonviolence means struggle against the symptoms and<\/em><\/strong> diseases killing us all, both piecemeal, and all at once.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Further Links:<\/strong><\/p>\n