{"id":4923,"date":"2015-08-10T18:30:14","date_gmt":"2015-08-10T22:30:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/?p=4923"},"modified":"2015-08-10T18:30:14","modified_gmt":"2015-08-10T22:30:14","slug":"cutting-the-triple-diamond-tipped-cranial-drill","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/?p=4923","title":{"rendered":"Cutting the Triple-Diamond-Tipped Cranial Drill"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Nature<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Ted Hand recently linked me to this piece by Steven Pinker<\/a>, in which Pinker claims that,\u00a0in contemporary society, the only job of Bioethics\u2014and by, following his argument to its conclusion, technological ethics, as a whole\u2014is to “get out of the way” of progress. You can read the whole exchange between Ted, myself, and others by clicking through that link, if you want, and the Journal Nature also has a pretty good breakdown of some of the arguments against Pinker<\/a>, if you want to check them out, but I’m going to take some time to break it all down and expound upon it, here.<\/p>\n

Because the fact of the matter is we have to find some third path between the likes of Pinker saying “No limits! WOO!” and Hawking<\/a> saying “Never do anything! BOOOO!”\u2014a Middle Way of Augmented Personhood, if you will. As Deb Chachra said, “It doesn’t have to be a dichotomy.”<\/p>\n

But the problem is that, while I want to blend the best and curtail the worst of both both impulses, I have all this vitriol, here. Like, sure<\/strong><\/em>, Dr Pinker, it’s not like humans ever met a problem we couldn’t immediately<\/i><\/b> handle, right? We’ll just sort it all out when we get there! We’ve got this global warming thing completely in hand and we know exactly <\/strong><\/em>how to regard the status of the now-enhanced humans we previously considered “disabled,” and how to respect the alterity of autistic\/neuroatypical minds! Or even just differently-pigmented humans! Yeah, no, that’s all perfectly<\/strong><\/em> sorted, and we did it all in situ!<\/p>\n

So no need to worry about what it’ll be like as we further immediate and integrate biotechnological advances! SCIENCE’LL FIX THAT FOR US WHEN IT HAPPENS<\/strong><\/em>! Why bother figuring out how to get a wider society to think about what “enhancement” means to them, BEFORE <\/strong><\/em>they begin to normalize upgrading to the point that other modes of existence are processed out, entirely? Those phenomenological models can’t have anything of VALUE<\/strong><\/em> to teach us, otherwise SCIENCE<\/strong><\/em> would’ve figured it all out and SHOWN <\/strong><\/em>it to us, by now!<\/p>\n

Science would’ve told us what benefit blindness may be. Science would’ve TOLD<\/strong><\/em> us if we could learn new ways of thinking and understanding by thinking about a thing BEFORE<\/strong><\/em> it comes to be! After all, this isn’t some set of biased and human-created Institutions and Modalities, here, folks! It’s SCIENCE!<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

\u2026And then I flip 37 tables. In a row.<\/p>\n

The Lessons <\/u><\/b><\/div>\n
\n
“\u2026Johns Hopkins, syphilis, and Guatemala. Everyone *believes* they are doing right.” \u2014Deb Chachra<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n

As previously noted in “Object Lessons in Freedom<\/a>,” there is no one in the history of the world who has undertaken a path for anything other than reasons they value. We can get into ideas of meta-valuation and second-order desires, later, but for the sake of having a short hand, right now: Your motivations motivate you, and whatever you do, you do because you are motivated to do it. You believe that you’re either doing the right thing, or the wrong thing for the right reasons, which is ultimately the same thing. This process has not exactly always brought us to the best of outcomes.<\/p>\n

From Tuskegee, to Thalidomide<\/a> (also here<\/a>) to dozens of other cases, there have always been instances where people who think they know what’s in the public’s best interest loudly lobby (or secretly conspire) to be allowed to do whatever they want, without oversight or restriction. In a sense, the abuse of persons in the name of “progress” is synonymous with the history of the human species, and so a case might be made that we wouldn’t be where and what we are, right now, if we didn’t occasionally (often) disregard ethics and just do what “needed doing.” But let’s put that another way:<\/p>\n

We wouldn’t be where and what we are, if we didn’t occasionally (often) disregard ethics and just do what “needed doing.”<\/p>\n

As species, we are more often shortsighted than not, and much ink has been spilled, and many more pixels have been formed in the effort to interrogate that fact. We tend to think about a very small group of people connected to ourselves, and we focus our efforts how to make sure that we and they survive. And so competition becomes selected for, in the face of finite resources, and is tied up with a pleasurable sense of “Having More Than.” But this is just a descriptor of what is<\/i><\/b>, not of the way things “have to be<\/i><\/b>.” We’ve seen where we get when we work together, and we’ve seen where we get when we compete, but the evolutionarily- and sociologically-ingrained belief that we can and will “win” keeps us doing he later over the former, even though this competition is clearly fucking us all into the ground.<\/p>\n

\u2026And then having the descendants of whatever survives digging up that ground millions of years later in search of the kinds of resources that can only be renewed one way: by time and pressure crushing us all to paste.<\/p>\n

The Community: Head and Heart<\/u><\/b><\/div>\n

Keeping in mind the work we do, here, I think it can be taken as read that I’m not one for a policy of “gently-gently, slowly-slowly,” when it comes to technological advances, but when basic forethought <\/strong><\/em>is equated with Luddism\u2014that is, when we’re told that “PROGRESS Is The Only Way!”\u2122\u2014when long-term implications and unintended consequences are no bother ‘t’all, Because Science,<\/strong><\/em> and when people place the fonts of this dreck as the public faces of the intersections of Philosophy and Science? Well then, to put it politely, we are All Fucked.<\/p>\n

If we had Transmetropolitan<\/a>-esque Farsight Reservations<\/a>, then I would 100% support the going to there and doing of that, but do you know what it takes to get<\/strong><\/em> to Farsight? It takes planning and (funnily enough) FORESIGHT<\/strong><\/span><\/em>. We have to do the work of thinking through<\/strong><\/em> the problems, implications, dangers, and literal existential risks of what it is we’re trying to make.<\/p>\n

And then we have to take all of what we’ve thought through, and decide to figure out a way to do it all anyway<\/b><\/i>. What I’m saying is that some of this shit can’t be Whoopsed through\u2014we won’t survive it to learn a post hoc<\/em> lesson. But that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t be trying<\/i><\/b>. This is about saying, “Yeah, let’s DO<\/strong><\/em> this, but let’s have thought about it, first<\/i><\/b>.” And to achieve that, we’ll need to be thinking faster and more thoroughly. Many of us have been trying to have this conversation\u2014the basic framework and complete implications of all of this\u2014for over a decade now; the wider conversation’s just now catching up.<\/p>\n

But it seems that Steven Pinker wants to drive forward without ever actually learning the principles of driving (though some do propose that we could learn the controls as we go<\/a>), and Stephen Hawking never wants us to get in the car at all. Neither of these is particularly sustainable, in the long term. Our desires to see a greater field of work done, and for biomedical advancements to be made, for the sake of increasing all of our options, and to the benefit of the long-term health of our species, and the unfucking of our relationship with the planet, all of these possibilities make many of us understandably impatient<\/a>, and in some cases, near-desperately anxious to get underway. But that doesn’t mean that we have to throw ethical considerations out the window.<\/p>\n

Starting from either place of “YES ALWAYS DO ALL THE SCIENCE” or “NO NEVER DO THESE SCIENCES” doesn’t get us to the point of understanding why<\/i><\/b> we’re doing the science we’re doing, and what we hope to achieve by<\/i><\/b> it (“increased knowledge” an acceptable answer, but be prepared to show your work), and what we’ll do if we accidentally start Eugenics-ing all up in this piece, again. Tech and Biotech ethics isn’t about stopping us<\/i><\/b> from exploring. It’s about asking why<\/i><\/b> we want to explore at all, and coming to terms with the real and often unintended consequences that exploration might have on our lives and future generations.<\/p>\n

This is a Propellerheads and Shirley Bassey Reference<\/b><\/u><\/div>\n

In an ideal timeline, we’ll have already done all of this thinking in advance (again: what do you think this project is?), but even if not, then we can at least stay a few steps ahead of the tumult.<\/p>\n

I feel like I spend a lot of time repeating<\/a> myself<\/a>, these days<\/a>, but if it means we’re mindful and aware of our works, before and as we undertake them, rather than flailing-ly reacting to our aftereffects, then it’s ultimately pretty worth it. We can<\/i><\/b> place ourselves into the kind of mindset that seeks to be constantly considering the possibilities inherent in each new instance.<\/p>\n

We don’t engage in ethics to prevent<\/strong><\/em> us from acting. We do ethics in order to make certain that, when we do<\/i><\/b> act, it’s because we understand what it means\u00a0to\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>act and we still want to.<\/strong><\/em> Not just driving blindly forward because we literally cannot conceive of any other way.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Nature Ted Hand recently linked me to this piece by Steven Pinker, in which Pinker claims that,\u00a0in contemporary society, the only job of Bioethics\u2014and by, following his argument to its conclusion, technological ethics, as a whole\u2014is to “get out of the way” of progress. You can read the whole exchange between Ted, myself, and […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[1020,1021,106,278,1023,627,1025,1026,790,1022,1024],"class_list":["post-4923","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-bioethics","tag-biotech-ethics","tag-biotechnology","tag-ethics","tag-forethought","tag-philosophy","tag-philosophy-of-science","tag-philosophy-of-technology","tag-stephen-hawking","tag-steven-pinker","tag-the-myth-of-progress"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p5WByP-1hp","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":5239,"url":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/?p=5239","url_meta":{"origin":4923,"position":0},"title":"The Frankenbook Project","author":"Damien P. Williams","date":"January 23, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"So, many of you may remember that back in June of 2016, I was invited to the Brocher Institute in Hermance, Switzerland, on the shores of Lake Geneva, to take part in the Frankenstein's Shadow Symposium sponsored by Arizona State University\u2019s Center for Science and the Imagination as part of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"arizona state university\"","block_context":{"text":"arizona state university","link":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/?tag=arizona-state-university"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/web.archive.org\/web\/20230911045322im_\/https%3A\/\/gallery.tinyletterapp.com\/15ed533d99d868864bc68d95ddd746a57dfc048f\/images\/e5850a88-f00d-44c7-a809-c868019ea28f.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/web.archive.org\/web\/20230911045322im_\/https%3A\/\/gallery.tinyletterapp.com\/15ed533d99d868864bc68d95ddd746a57dfc048f\/images\/e5850a88-f00d-44c7-a809-c868019ea28f.jpg?resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/web.archive.org\/web\/20230911045322im_\/https%3A\/\/gallery.tinyletterapp.com\/15ed533d99d868864bc68d95ddd746a57dfc048f\/images\/e5850a88-f00d-44c7-a809-c868019ea28f.jpg?resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":5023,"url":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/?p=5023","url_meta":{"origin":4923,"position":1},"title":"Flash Forward Podcast Ep 10: Rude Bot Rises","author":"Damien P. Williams","date":"April 5, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"http:\/\/www.flashforwardpod.com\/2016\/04\/05\/episode-10-rude-bot-rises\/ So. The Flash Forward Podcast is one of the best around. Every week, host Rose Eveleth takes on another potential future, from the near and imminent to the distant and highly implausible. It\u2019s been featured on a bunch of Best Podcast lists and Rose even did a segment for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"A Future Worth Thinking About\"","block_context":{"text":"A Future Worth Thinking About","link":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/?tag=a-future-worth-thinking-about"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com\/widget-images\/become-patron-widget-medium%402x.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":5281,"url":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/?p=5281","url_meta":{"origin":4923,"position":2},"title":"The Human Futures and Intelligent Machines Summit at Virginia Tech","author":"Damien P. Williams","date":"June 8, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"This weekend, Virginia Tech's Center for the Humanities is hosting The Human Futures and Intelligent Machines Summit, and there is a link for the video cast of the events. You'll need to Download and install Zoom, but it should be pretty straightforward, other than that. You'll find the full Schedule,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"A Future Worth Thinking About\"","block_context":{"text":"A Future Worth Thinking About","link":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/?tag=a-future-worth-thinking-about"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1210,"url":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/?p=1210","url_meta":{"origin":4923,"position":3},"title":"A Future Worth Thinking About: Does An AI Have A Buddha Nature?","author":"Damien P. Williams","date":"February 8, 2015","format":"link","excerpt":"Let me be SUPER clear, so we can remove all doubt: The potential moral Patiency of #ai\/#robots\u2014that is, what responsibilities their creators have to THEM\u2014has been given Far Less consideration or even Credence than that of the AGENCY of said, and that is a Failure.I coined the phrase \u201c\u0152dipal Obsolescence\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"A Future Worth Thinking About\"","block_context":{"text":"A Future Worth Thinking About","link":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/?tag=a-future-worth-thinking-about"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":5316,"url":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/?p=5316","url_meta":{"origin":4923,"position":4},"title":"My Appearance on The Machine Ethics Podcast’s A.I. Retreat Episode","author":"Damien P. Williams","date":"October 23, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"As you already know, we went to the second Juvet A.I. Retreat, back in September. If you want to hear several of us talk about what we got up to at the then you're in luck because here are several conversations conducted by Ben Byford of the Machine Ethics Podcast.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"algorithmic bias\"","block_context":{"text":"algorithmic bias","link":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/?tag=algorithmic-bias"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/img.youtube.com\/vi\/ownE2zxTN2U\/0.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":5269,"url":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/?p=5269","url_meta":{"origin":4923,"position":5},"title":"My Review of Shannon Vallor’s TECHNOLOGY AND THE VIRTUES","author":"Damien P. Williams","date":"May 10, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"My piece \"Cultivating Technomoral Interrelations,\" a review of\u00a0Technology and the Virtues: A Philosophical Guide to a Future Worth Wanting has been up over at the Social Epistemology Research and Reply Collective for a few months, now, so I figured I should post something about it, here. As you'll read, I\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"A Future Worth Thinking About\"","block_context":{"text":"A Future Worth Thinking About","link":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/?tag=a-future-worth-thinking-about"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/socialepistemologydotcom.files.wordpress.com\/2018\/02\/shannon-vallor-technology-virtues-cover.jpg?w=350&h=200&crop=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4923","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4923"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4923\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4931,"href":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4923\/revisions\/4931"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4923"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4923"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4923"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}