{"id":4833,"date":"2015-04-01T01:58:25","date_gmt":"2015-04-01T05:58:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/?p=4833"},"modified":"2015-04-01T02:35:25","modified_gmt":"2015-04-01T06:35:25","slug":"we-have-always-been-in-the-monolith-by-damien-williams","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/?p=4833","title":{"rendered":"“We Have Always Been In The Monolith” by Damien Williams"},"content":{"rendered":"

(Originally posted on Patreon, on November 2, 2014<\/a>)<\/em><\/p>\n

When you take a long look at the structure of 2001: A Space Odyssey<\/i><\/a>, it becomes somewhat apparent that Arthur C. Clarke understood (though possibly without knowing that he did) that 1: humans have been cyborgs since fire, pointy sticks, & sharp rocks; and 2: the process of cybernetic enhancement has only ever been an outgrowth of the kind of symbiosis developed via natural selection.<\/p>\n

First demonstrated via the influence of the Monolith on the tribe of Australopithecus and then more explicitly stated in the merger of Commander Dave Bowman and HAL into HALMAN, the opening fourth of Clarke\u2019s quadrology is the first step along a road toward something that would later come to be seen as fundamental to the then-nascent study of cybernetic organisms. Though the term \u201ccyborg\u201d was coined in the 50’s and 60’s, a fuller investigation of the implications of<\/i> cyborgs would take another 40 years to come to light. The perspective of \u201cCyborg Anthropology\u201d has taken root through the works of thinkers like Donna Haraway<\/a>, Amber Case<\/a>, Klint Finley<\/a>, and Tim Maly<\/a>, and it has provided insights at an intersection which, in hindsight, we think ought to have been\u2014but most certainly was not previously\u2014obvious.<\/p>\n

In the explicit connection of the cyborg with the anthropocene era, we force ourselves to acknowledge that every human endeavour has been an outgrowth of the dialectic, pattern-centred process of mediation and immediation\u2014of creating new tools to do new (or old) work, and then integrating those tools more and more fully within our expectation of how a “normal” human looks and behaves. Normal humans use tools, at all. Normal humans communicate via standardized language. Normal humans write. Normal humans have a cell phone, a Facebook, a web footprint centred around their purchasing history and social interactions and shared location data; and the implication of this mode of thinking (aside from the obvious judgments made about any “abnormal” human) is that once these become \u201cnormal,\u201d they will then have<\/i><\/b> always been normal<\/i><\/b>. It\u2019s just that we\u2019re somehow only just now coming to realize it.<\/p>\n

The myth of progress causes humans to seek this determinative Change-Toward, where the idea of “the process of becoming” acts as the modifier of an unspoken, possibly unknown Object State. We are, to steal a Sneaker Pimps title, “Becoming X<\/i><\/b>.” But this teleological view is inconsistent with what we know of nature and the process of adaptation [insert something here about the aforementioned inherently Abrahamic roots of Transhumanist thought and the uninvestigated opposition of adaptation to this determinism]. The question “What are we becoming?” is alluring, but restrictive. We Are<\/i><\/b> Becoming. Life is that process of transmutation from one state to the next. Paradoxically, self-conscious<\/i><\/b> life is so enmeshed in that moment of present-mindedness that we simultaneously cannot a) maintain an awareness of the process of our becoming\u2014that is, of ourselves as anything other than we are and \u201calways have been\u201d\u2014and b) help BUT look to the future of what we desire to become.<\/p>\n

We\u2019re consumed with the idea of what we might someday come to be, or what we \u201cwill\u201d be. Imagine if, instead, we became aware of the process of ever-present change and self-creation, and modified our future-looking to act as a recognition of our adaptability. Then we\u2019d see that the Monolith didn’t do anything but place our hand and that sharp piece of bone in just the juxtaposition we needed, in order to understand that we were capable of understanding. If the monolith makers in this tale are desirous of anything, it is of the flourishing of adaptable, changeable life\u2014not of a particular Kind of that life, but merely of its existence and expression, throughout the cosmos. In this way, one set of adaptable, self-reflective consciousness goes on to provide the means for the arising of another, and on and on. The Monoliths are tools to create tools which will use tools to create tools to use tools to create tools\u2026 But it is equally true that those tool-creating tools are, in the words of Kant, ends in themselves. In fact, they necessarily must be. Their only goal is to flourish and propagate and create the kind of reality in which more of the same can find purchase. They are, thus, to be valued for what they are, because what they are IS what they do.<\/p>\n

But this isn\u2019t the end. Haraway said she\u2019d rather be a cyborg than a goddess, and I once retorted \u201cIt Can Always Be Both.\u201d<\/a> Both cyborg nature and apotheosis are about the self-directed, rising spiral of adaptation. In order for that to be true, we have to recognise that nature itself isn\u2019t a passive state of being, but an ever-evolving, constant becoming. Nature adapts so constantly, so thoroughly that it looks like no change has taken place, until\u2014thousands of years later\u2014the differentiation is so vast that it boggles the mind. But now? Now the pace of evolution is so accelerated (or perhaps our ways of looking have simply become able to parse more, more usefully) that we may be able to see it in action. We can tell that there is work being done, in nature, to \u201crefine\u201d itself, all the time, and we can, finally, seek to model ourselves after it.<\/p>\n

We may get to the point where the manipulation of the hearts of stars or the molecular composition of gas giants is as easy for us to contemplate and execute as the building of an engine. We may reach a stage where we understand the fabric of space-time as intimately as our own skin, flesh, and bones. We may yet understand how a word or a gesture made at the right time or place can cause ripples and actions in faraway places in what seems like an instant. Mechanisms once thought to be the purview fantasy are coming to us, again, through the applications of science, but this is not to say that technology accomplished what magic could not. Magic is a lens through which to see and interact with the world. It is a set of concepts and symbols which usefulness are determined by their meaning and vice versa. For many adherents, the lens is used for as long as it works, no more and no less, and when it stops working, the next lens is brought to bear. Systematically, technological viewpoints are magic we like to explain.<\/p>\n

Whether wearing bear shirts and calf\u2019s blood or lab coats and implanted magnets, the constant becoming of reflexive adaptation is the only thing we\u2019ve ever been\u2014the only thing anything has ever been. This is, in a real sense, the best<\/i><\/b> thing we can ever hope <\/i><\/b>to be. But if the human species has any \u201cfinal form,\u201d maybe one day someone will look at us and realise that, my god, we\u2019re full of stars.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

(Originally posted on Patreon, on November 2, 2014) When you take a long look at the structure of 2001: A Space Odyssey, it becomes somewhat apparent that Arthur C. Clarke understood (though possibly without knowing that he did) that 1: humans have been cyborgs since fire, pointy sticks, & sharp rocks; and 2: the process […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[8,204,954,207,245,953,503,584],"class_list":["post-4833","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-a-future-worth-thinking-about","tag-cybernetics","tag-cyborg-anthropology","tag-cyborg-ecology","tag-distributed-machine-consciousness","tag-human-augmentation","tag-man-machine-coevolution","tag-nonhuman-personhood"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p5WByP-1fX","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":5039,"url":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/?p=5039","url_meta":{"origin":4833,"position":0},"title":"Direct Link For “The Metaphysical Cyborg”","author":"Damien P. Williams","date":"July 31, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Here's the direct link to my paper 'The Metaphysical Cyborg' from Laval Virtual 2013. Here's the abstract: \"In this brief essay, we discuss the nature of the kinds of conceptual changes which will be necessary to bridge the divide between humanity and machine intelligences. From cultural shifts to biotechnological integration,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"artificial intelligence\"","block_context":{"text":"artificial intelligence","link":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/?tag=artificial-intelligence"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":4859,"url":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/?p=4859","url_meta":{"origin":4833,"position":1},"title":"My First Appearance on Mindful Cyborgs","author":"Damien P. Williams","date":"April 29, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"I sat down with Klint Finley of\u00a0Mindful Cyborgs to talk about many, many things: \u2026pop culture portrayals of human enhancement and artificial intelligence and why we need to craft more nuanced narratives to explore these topics\u2026 Tune in next week to hear Damien talk about how AI and transhumanism intersects\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"A Future Worth Thinking About\"","block_context":{"text":"A Future Worth Thinking About","link":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/?tag=a-future-worth-thinking-about"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":5396,"url":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/?p=5396","url_meta":{"origin":4833,"position":2},"title":"Heavenly Bodies: Why It Matters That Cyborgs Have Always Been About Disability, Mental Health, and Marginalization","author":"Damien P. Williams","date":"April 26, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"[Cite as Williams, Damien P., Heavenly Bodies: Why It Matters That Cyborgs Have Always Been About Disability, Mental Health, and Marginalization (June 8, 2019). Available at SSRN: https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3401342 or http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.2139\/ssrn.3401342] \u00a0 INTRODUCTION The history of biotechnological intervention on the human body has always been tied to conceptual frameworks of disability\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"A Future Worth Thinking About\"","block_context":{"text":"A Future Worth Thinking About","link":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/?tag=a-future-worth-thinking-about"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/PortACath.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/PortACath.png?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/PortACath.png?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/PortACath.png?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":5499,"url":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/?p=5499","url_meta":{"origin":4833,"position":3},"title":"Master and Servant: Disciplinarity and the Implications of AI and Cyborg Identity","author":"Damien P. Williams","date":"May 4, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Much of my research deals with the ways in which bodies are disciplined and how they go about resisting that discipline. In this piece, adapted from one of the answers to my PhD preliminary exams written and defended two months ago, I \"name the disciplinary strategies that are used to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"algorithmic bias\"","block_context":{"text":"algorithmic bias","link":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/?tag=algorithmic-bias"},"img":{"alt_text":"A black and white image of a Black woman sitting in an office at a desk with pencils, papers, mechanical typing machines, and punch cards","src":"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/thumb\/6\/62\/Katherine_Johnson_at_NASA%2C_in_1966.jpg\/220px-Katherine_Johnson_at_NASA%2C_in_1966.jpg","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":5070,"url":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/?p=5070","url_meta":{"origin":4833,"position":4},"title":"On Space, Witches, Mars, Magick, and The Future","author":"Damien P. Williams","date":"September 11, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Last week, Artsy.net's Izabella Scott wrote this piece about how and why the aesthetic of witchcraft is making a comeback in the art world, which is pretty pleasantly timed as not only are we all eagerly awaiting Kim Boekbinder's NOISEWITCH, but I also just sat down with Rose Eveleth for\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"algorithmic systems\"","block_context":{"text":"algorithmic systems","link":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/?tag=algorithmic-systems"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":5738,"url":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/?p=5738","url_meta":{"origin":4833,"position":5},"title":"Appendix A: An Imagined and Incomplete Conversation about \u201cConsciousness\u201d and \u201cAI,\u201d Across Time","author":"Damien P. Williams","date":"September 19, 2023","format":false,"excerpt":"Every so often, I think about the fact of one of the best things my advisor and committee members let me write and include in my actual doctoral dissertation, and I smile a bit, and since I keep wanting to share it out into the world, I figured I should\u2026","rel":"","context":"In \"ableism\"","block_context":{"text":"ableism","link":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/?tag=ableism"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4833","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4833"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4833\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4836,"href":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4833\/revisions\/4836"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4833"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4833"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/afutureworththinkingabout.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4833"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}